Strategic Policy Interventions for Global Stability
About the Paper
Food insecurity and conflict are interconnected in a cycle that has profound implications for global stability and security. This paper explores the geopolitical dynamics that link food insecurity with conflict, illustrating how food can serve as both a cause and consequence of violence. By examining historical and contemporary case studies, we show how food is used as a tool for political leverage and, a weapon of war, and how food scarcity influences global power dynamics and international alliances. This paper also presents strategic policy interventions to integrate food security into peacebuilding and international cooperation.
Key Takeaways
Food as a Strategic Asset:
Food is often used as a tool of political leverage and a weapon of war.
Examples include Venezuela’s food-based political control, Russia’s use of grain exports during the Ukraine conflict, and Al-Shabaab’s targeting of food supplies in Somalia.
Cyclic Relationship Between Food Insecurity and Conflict:
Food scarcity can trigger conflict, and conflicts disrupt food production and distribution, creating a vicious cycle.
Yemen and the Sahel region are highlighted as key examples of this dynamic.
Global Power Dynamics:
Food-secure nations wield significant global influence, while food-insecure nations often rely on external aid, compromising their sovereignty.
Food diplomacy is used by nations like the US and China to build alliances and exert influence.
Strategic Policy Interventions:
Conflict-Sensitive Food Aid: Aid must account for local conflict dynamics to prevent misuse or harm.
Education for Leaders: Political and security leaders should be educated on food systems' roles in global stability.
Integration into Peacebuilding: Food security should be embedded into national security and peacebuilding frameworks, emphasizing climate-smart agriculture and resilient food systems.
Diplomatic Tools: Sanctions relief and targeted economic diplomacy can improve food security without exacerbating conflicts.
Nutrition Security as Conflict Prevention:
Access to nutrient-rich food is critical for health and societal resilience.
Targeted programs can mitigate instability and lay the groundwork for sustainable peace.
Recommendations for Global Cooperation:
Establish dedicated roles within defense and diplomatic institutions to prioritize food security in national and global security strategies.
Enhance international collaboration through organizations like the FAO and WFP to address systemic food crises.
By addressing food insecurity as a central element of conflict prevention and resolution, this paper argues for integrated and informed approaches to foster global stability and peace.
Download the Full Paper (PDF) below:
Find more about this paper on Aspen Strategy Group.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Navy, U.S. government, Food Systems for the Future, nor any other affiliated organization or employer.
Cedric Habiyaremye is the food systems policy director at Food Systems for the Future.
Timothy Pietrack is a public affairs officer in the United States Navy.
Comments